This is perplexing to me. Swine flu vaccine, for example, was touted as safe but the vaccine program was halted after 25 deaths were associated with the giving of the vaccine. If vaccines were always safe, then the U.S. and British governments would not have set up programs to compensate parents of children who have been shown to be damaged by vaccines. The most vulnerable of society are our children and pregnant mothers-to-be. We must protect them at all costs.
The three fundamental principles of Western Bioethics are:
- There must be full and complete disclosure of risks associated with any drug or therapy;
- There must be full comprehension of the risks associated with any drug or therapy;
- There must be willing consent to take the drug or therapy.
Informed consent can only be given when all the known risks and benefits of any therapy have been presented equally. If data are known and withheld or suppressed, then informed consent cannot be given. If consent is the result of coersion then informed consent has been invalidated. I would challenge anyone that informed consent can be given by anyone less than the age of majority – or at least the age of 16. Otherwise, we would have had 12 – 15 year olds voting in the last election.
There are two assumptions relevant to the safety scenario: 1) that the spike protein remains anchored at the muscle cell membrane and does not enter the circulation directly, 2) that the spike protein is not biologically active by itself. There is now evidence indicating that neither of these assumptions are true. If I were considering having the “jab”, I would want to know what happens when the spike protein enters the circulation and, what damage could it potentially do. The Japanese bio-distribution data (provided to the Japanese government by Pfizer before the vaccine rollout), for example, indicated that the spike protein preferentially accumulates in the ovaries and the heart muscle. Could this be the connection to the changes in menstrual cycles seen in some women and myocarditis in some young men? Would you have wanted to know this data before deciding to be vaccinated or allowing your child to be vaccinated? I know that I would.
What are the ways in which potential vaccine side-effects are reported? There are a few agencies worldwide that do this. VAERS in the USA is one of them. Some of the others are the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the United Kingdom and the EUDRA (European Union Drug Regulation Agency) What all of these agencies are looking for in their databases are “signals” for potential problems. When a side-effect is reported it is catalogued and the results analyzed. If there is a significant increase in the reporting of a potential side-effect it may warrant further investigation. At this point, I am unsure as to how many adverse events is considered “significant”.
The United Kingdom has one of countries with a high vaccination rate. I became concerned at the end of May, when I came across a preliminary report that was filed by Dr. Tess Lawrie (MBBCh, Ph.D) the Director the the Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy Ltd. in the U.K. to Dr. June Raine, M.D., the Chief Executive of the MHRA. After analyzing the data in the Yellow Card surveillance system, Dr. Lawrie – in her 11 page report – concluded that:
“The MHRA how has more than enough evidence on the Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans. Preparation should be made to scale up humanitarian efforts to assist those harmed by the COVID-19 vaccines and to anticipate and ameliorate medium to longer term effects. As the mechanism for harms from the vaccines appears to be similar to COVID-19 itself, this includes engaging with numerous international doctors and scientist with expertise in successfully treating COVID-19”
The VAERS stated on August 8, 2021:
“Data released today show that between December 14, 2020 and July 30 2021, a total of 545,338 total adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 12,366 deaths – an increase of 426 over the previous week. There were 70,105 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period – up 7,003 compared with the previous week.”
“Of the 5,739 deaths reported as of July 30, 13% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 19% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 34% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.”
The Open VAERS through October 8th, 2021 reports 798,634 Adverse events with 16,766 deaths 79,669 hospitalizations, 89,923 urgent cases, 124,398 doctor office visits, 7,336 anaphylactic reactions and 9,787 cases of Bell’s Palsy. Since it is known that only about 1 % of adverse events are reported, the actual numbers are probably considerably higher.
These results have not been and have never been reported by mainstream media – mainly because they do not support the current narrative that the vaccines are effective and safe and the only way to “defeat” Covid and return to normal is for everyone to be vaccinated. It is apparent to me that the media – by reporting only one side of the issue – has suppressed our right to informed consent. This is a new technology. We are entitled to know ALL the data about these “jabs” and indeed must have it presented to us in order to give our “informed” consent. I encourage everyone to do their due diligence regarding this issue.